Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 51 1570 402 245 194 404 .256 .352 .364
.364 2 Paris Junior College 55 1568 425 280 266 537 .271 .385 .450
.450 3 Navarro College 59 1802 527 399 289 458 .292 .409 .454
.454 4 Angelina College 54 1636 488 298 223 335 .298 .394 .430
.430 5 Panola College 53 1616 484 336 225 348 .300 .402 .471
.471 6 Bossier Parish Community College 52 1628 497 283 183 377 .305 .384 .448
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 51 73 6 28 107
107 2 Angelina College 54 82 13 36 131
131 3 Bossier Parish Community College 52 109 9 35 153
153 4 Paris Junior College 55 93 20 49 162
162 5 Panola College 53 112 12 47 171
171 6 Navarro College 59 110 20 47 177
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 51 301 571 73 21
21 2 Bossier Parish Community College 52 327 729 67 16
16 3 Paris Junior College 55 329 705 168 37
37 4 Angelina College 54 349 704 52 16
16 5 Panola College 53 369 761 65 15
15 6 Navarro College 59 453 818 91 32
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 51 47 18 27 17 0 - - 1856
1856 2 Bossier Parish Community College 52 38 21 8 9 7 9 .78 1878
1878 3 Paris Junior College 55 38 20 9 9 - - - 1901
1901 4 Panola College 53 58 8 3 2 - - - 1910
1910 5 Angelina College 54 45 15 23 6 0 - - 1942
1942 6 Navarro College 59 85 28 26 27 37 38 .97 2230
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Panola College 53 53 400.0 344 232 158 3.56
3.56 2 Navarro College 59 59 463.0 437 298 222 4.32
4.32 3 Bossier Parish Community College 52 52 369.0 359 265 193 4.71
4.71 4 Angelina College 54 54 404.1 448 277 216 4.81
4.81 5 Paris Junior College 55 55 411.1 433 355 270 5.91
5.91 6 Northeast Texas Community College 51 51 400.0 474 339 265 5.96
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Panola College 53 53 431 9.70 22 1.32
1.32 2 Bossier Parish Community College 52 52 415 10.12 41 1.41
1.41 3 Navarro College 59 59 471 9.16 30 1.47
1.47 4 Angelina College 54 54 461 10.26 24 1.48
1.48 5 Paris Junior College 55 55 414 9.06 33 1.68
1.68 6 Northeast Texas Community College 51 51 379 8.53 35 1.72
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Panola College 53 1358 1201 87 70 28 .948
.948 2 Bossier Parish Community College 52 1650 1166 399 85 41 .948
.948 2 Paris Junior College 55 1652 1223 347 82 20 .950
.950 4 Northeast Texas Community College 51 1576 1194 304 78 20 .951
.951 5 Navarro College 59 1986 1381 509 96 32 .952
.952 6 Angelina College 54 1655 1216 366 73 8 .956
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 51 9 74 3 .039 0
0 2 Paris Junior College 55 12 68 3 .042 -
- 3 Angelina College 54 13 41 2 .047 1
1 4 Panola College 53 11 40 5 .111 -
- 5 Navarro College 59 16 81 11 .120 -
- 5 Bossier Parish Community College 52 23 66 10 .132 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 30 912 231 125 94 240 .253 .339 .355
.355 2 Paris Junior College 30 842 191 90 99 324 .227 .315 .379
.379 3 Navarro College 33 1023 324 233 147 226 .317 .416 .495
.495 4 Angelina College 30 912 283 163 105 200 .310 .386 .433
.433 5 Panola College 30 938 273 177 127 209 .291 .388 .469
.469 6 Bossier Parish Community College 30 914 265 131 77 226 .290 .350 .404
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 30 39 3 16 58
58 2 Angelina College 30 46 9 16 71
71 3 Bossier Parish Community College 30 46 5 16 67
67 4 Paris Junior College 30 36 4 28 68
68 5 Panola College 30 57 10 30 97
97 6 Navarro College 33 64 14 30 108
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 30 155 324 24 14
14 2 Bossier Parish Community College 30 154 369 21 6
6 3 Paris Junior College 30 105 319 41 13
13 4 Angelina College 30 179 395 29 11
11 5 Panola College 30 195 440 41 10
10 6 Navarro College 33 260 506 41 18
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 30 29 8 17 8 0 - - 1060
1060 2 Bossier Parish Community College 30 13 10 6 8 0 - - 1020
1020 3 Paris Junior College 30 12 5 6 5 - - - 964
964 4 Panola College 30 25 5 3 2 - - - 1098
1098 5 Angelina College 30 14 11 17 - 0 - - 1059
1059 6 Navarro College 33 41 19 18 13 16 21 .76 1248
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Panola College 30 30 235.0 213 134 93 3.56
3.56 2 Navarro College 33 33 255.2 243 150 109 3.84
3.84 3 Bossier Parish Community College 30 30 222.2 229 185 141 5.70
5.70 4 Angelina College 30 30 217.2 243 155 116 4.80
4.80 5 Paris Junior College 30 30 224.1 262 214 161 6.46
6.46 6 Northeast Texas Community College 30 30 228.0 292 200 159 6.28
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Panola College 30 30 243 9.31 16 1.34
1.34 2 Bossier Parish Community College 30 30 232 9.38 29 1.49
1.49 3 Navarro College 33 33 281 9.89 19 1.42
1.42 4 Angelina College 30 30 246 10.17 15 1.43
1.43 5 Paris Junior College 30 30 219 8.79 18 1.77
1.77 6 Northeast Texas Community College 30 30 208 8.21 25 1.77
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
$value 1 Panola College 30 760 704 18 38 19 .950
.950 2 Bossier Parish Community College 30 950 666 234 50 25 .947
.947 3 Paris Junior College 30 901 669 187 45 12 .950
.950 4 Northeast Texas Community College 30 889 684 166 39 11 .956
.956 5 Navarro College 33 1082 764 262 56 11 .948
.948 6 Angelina College 30 910 664 196 50 4 .945
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
$value 1 Northeast Texas Community College 30 8 33 2 .057 0
0 2 Paris Junior College 30 7 37 1 .026 -
- 3 Angelina College 30 5 21 0 .000 1
1 4 Panola College 30 8 23 3 .115 -
- 5 Navarro College 33 6 39 5 .114 -
- 5 Bossier Parish Community College 30 10 48 3 .059 0